For example, to print only the third page of a document, enter 3 in both range boxes. This option appears only if your printer supports black and white printing. Print on both sides of the paper (also called duplex printing. Printing On Both Sides of the Paper. The -o sidestwo-sided-short-edge and -o sidestwo-sided-long-edge options will enable two-sided printing on the printer if the printer supports it. The -o sidestwo-sided-short-edge option is suitable for landscape pages, while the -o sidestwo-sided-long-edge option is suitable for portrait pages:Print every other page by picking "Odd Only" or "Even Only."Windows 2000 / XP / Vista, Windows Server 2003 / 2003 R2 / 2008.This is a more common issue with older laser printers most newer ones allow duplex printing. You can safely put your paper twice through any inkjet printer, since no heat is involved in the inkjet printing process. What should I do How do I connect my WPS-enabled wireless router to my product The option for 2-Sided Printing (Windows) or Two-Sided Printing Settings (Mac) is gray or not available.The printer HP Deskjet 1510 cannot perform automatic duplex printing, it must be done manually. Ill tell how you to print double-sided of the Microsoft.4.What’s to stop them from coming in and replicating your model?There are companies that are doing things at the high end of the market, and they make very fat margins doing it. What is worth referring to with this announcement, though, is this clip I posted of Prince’s initial launch of Cloudflare at TechCrunch Disrupt 2010, particularly this bit from the Q&A:So from a competitive standpoint, obviously you’re intruding on some of the stuff that the bigger boys are doing, and they’ve been at this for a long time. Cloudflare’s EvolutionI already wrote earlier this year about Cloudflare’s unique advantages in a world where the Internet is increasingly fragmented, thanks to the distributed nature of their service, and why that positioned the company to compete with the major cloud providers in the long run. It will be compatible with S3’s API, which makes it much easier to move applications already written with S3 in mind, and Cloudflare said that beyond the elimination of egress fees, the new service will be 10% cheaper to operate than S3.Cloudflare has always framed itself as a disruptor R2 lives up to its reputation.
Back to Christensen:Because new-market disruptions compete against nonconsumption, the incumbent leaders feel no pain and little threat until the disruption is in its final stages.This is where R2 comes in. The disruptive innovation doesn’t invade the mainstream stream market rather, it pulls customers out of the mainstream value network into the new one because these customers find it more convenient to use the new product.This was Cloudflare Workers, edge compute functionality that was a great match for Cloudflare’s CDN offering, but certainly not a competitor for AWS’s core offerings. Christensen continued:Although new-market disruptions initially compete against nonconsumption in their unique value network, as their performance improves they ultimately become good enough to pull customers out of the original value network into the new one, starting with the least-demanding tier. These constitute either new customers who previously lacked the money or skills to buy and use the product, or different situations in which a product can be used — enabled by improvements in simplicity, portability, and product cost…We say that new-market disruptions compete with “nonconsumption” because new-market disruptive products are so much more affordable to own and simpler to use that they enable a whole new population of people to begin owning and using the product, and to do so in a more convenient setting.That’s not the end of the story, though: new market disruptors don’t stand still, but can leverage the huge runway provided by the new market to build up their product capabilities in a way that eventually threatens the incumbent. That means that compute capacity has to be built out for the worst case scenario, even though that means most resources are sitting idle most of the time. First, usage may be uneven, whether that be because a business is seasonal, hit-driven, or anything in-between. This same logic applies to computing capacity: buying your own servers is, in theory, cheaper than renting compute from a service like AWS.When it comes to compute, however, reality is very different than theory. A streaming service like Netflix, on the other hand, that spends up front for its own content, gets to keep whatever increased revenue that content drives for itself. Consider Spotify’s music-streaming business: one of the company’s core challenges is that the more customers Spotify has the more it has to pay music labels — streaming rights are a marginal cost. AWS would be responsible for all of the up-front investment and ongoing maintenance, and because they would operate at such scale, they would get much better prices from suppliers than any individual company could on its own.It’s impossible to overstate the extent to which AWS changed the world, particularly Silicon Valley. Customers could rent exactly how much compute they needed at any moment in time, even as they were able to seamlessly handle growth. Customers could scale their compute up-or-down instantly in response to their needs. That means there are both huge fixed costs that have to be invested before the compute can be used, and also significant ongoing marginal costs to manage the compute already online.This is why AWS was so transformative: Amazon would spend all of the up-front money to build out compute capacity for all of its customers, and then rent it on-demand, solving all of the problems I just listed: Third, compute capacity is complex and expensive. Building out infrastructure, though, is not a linear process: new capacity comes online all at once, which means a business has to overbuild for their current needs so that they can accommodate future growth, which again means that most resources are sitting idle most of the time. Turn On Two Sided Printing Software And AdvertisingAnd perhaps more importantly is the corporate culture that results from a “your-margins-are-my-opportunity” mindset: Amazon can stomach a few percentage points of margin on a core business far more comfortably than Microsoft or Google, both fat off of software and advertising margins respectively. What happens if either competitor launches a price war: can Amazon afford to keep up?To be sure, there were reasons to suspect they could: for one, Amazon already has significantly more scale, which means their costs on a per-customer basis are lower than Microsoft or Google. Data centers are very expensive, and Amazon has a lot less cash and, more importantly, a lot less profit than Google or Microsoft. Amazon, meanwhile, suddenly had a free option on basically every startup in the world, positioning itself to levy The Amazon Tax on every company that succeeded.The scale of these options became clear to the world in 2015 when Amazon broke out AWS’s financials for the first time I called it The AWS IPO:The big question about AWS, though, has been whether Amazon can keep their lead. Hp officejet 4500 wireless driver for mac 10681 Google, meanwhile, has been even further behind, particularly in terms of matching AWS’s sheer breadth of services (even if they weren’t always technically great), making it harder for businesses already used to AWS to shift.The egress fees R2 is targeting, though, have played a big role as well. A big reason is that Microsoft in particular has pursued different customers, coaxing existing businesses to the cloud, thanks in part to their early focus on hybrid solutions. And, to many people’s surprise, and despite all the price cuts, AWS is very profitable: $265 million in profit on $1.57 billion in sales last quarter alone, for an impressive (for Amazon!) 17% net margin.Those numbers last quarter are up to $4.2 billion in profit on $14.9 billion in revenue for a net margin of 28%: Amazon has increased its margins, even as Microsoft and Google have increased their focus on the cloud. Still, the question remained: was this sustainable? Could Amazon afford to compete?This is why Amazon’s latest earnings were such a big deal: for the first time the company broke out AWS into its own line item, revealing not just its revenue (which could be teased out previously) but also its profitability.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorKatherine ArchivesCategories |